Annual report pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

v2.4.0.8
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
16.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Effective August 1, 2010, the Company extended its office lease agreement for its office for a term of one year with monthly lease payments of $2,100. Since August 1, 2011, the office lease continues at the same rate on a month-to-month basis.
 
The Company leases the land and buildings for its five restaurants in South Africa, 10 restaurants in the United States and one restaurant in each of Hungary and the United Kingdome through its subsidiaries. The South Africa and United Kingdom leases are for five year terms and the Hungary lease is for a 10 year term and include options to extend the terms. The 10 restaurants operated in the United States have lease terms varying from five to 10 years and have options to extend. We lease some of our restaurant facilities under “triple net” leases that require us to pay minimum rent, real estate taxes, maintenance costs and insurance premiums and, in some instances, percentage rent based on sales in excess of specified amounts.
 
Rent obligations for our 17 restaurants are presented below:
 
2014
 
$
1,598,671
 
2015
 
 
1,588,373
 
2016
 
 
1,483,784
 
2017
 
 
978,819
 
thereafter
 
 
4,330,625
 
Totals
 
$
9,980,272
 
 
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was $868,285 and $792,420, respectively. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 for the Company’s restaurants was $833,546 and $757,766, respectively, and is included in the “Restaurant operating expenses” of the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 for the non-restaurants was $34,739 and $34,654, and is included in the “General and administrative expense” of the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
 
On October 12, 2012, Francis Howard (“Howard”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a lawsuit against Chanticleer Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), Michael D. Pruitt, Eric S. Lederer, Michael Carroll, Paul I. Moskowitz, Keith Johnson (The “Individual Defendants”), Merriman Capital, Inc., Dawson James Securities, Inc. (The “Underwriter Defendants”), and Creason & Associates P.L.L.C. (The “Auditor Defendant”), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  The class action lawsuit alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act against all Defendants, violations of Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against only the Underwriter Defendants, and violations of Section 15 against the Individual Defendants.  Howard seeks unspecified damages, reasonable costs and expenses incurred in this action, and such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.  On October 31st, 2012, the Company and the Individual Defendants retained Stanley Wakshlag at Kenny Nachwalter, P.A. to represent them in this litigation. On December 12th, 2012, Howard filed a Motion to Appoint himself Lead Plaintiff and to Approve his selection of The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. as his Counsel.  An Order appointing Francis Howard and the Rosen Law Firm as lead Plaintiff and lead Plaintiff’s Counsel was entered on January 4, 2013.   On February 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint alleging similar claims to those previously asserted.  On May 20, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice of Defendants Dawson James Securities, Inc. and Merriman Capital, Inc. On September 17, 2013, Judge Cohn denied the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and ordered that Defendants file Answers to Plaintiff’s Amended Class Action Complaint by October 8, 2013, and that the trial be set for the two-week period commencing May 12, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.  The Company and Individual Defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s Amended Class Action Complaint on October 7, 2013.  A Scheduling Order was entered on October 8, 2013 after a Scheduling Conference was held, whereby a timeframe was set for Disclosures, Mediation, Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings, Discovery, and Pre-Trial Motions. The parties have made initial disclosures, and document requests and interrogatories have been served. On December 18, 2013, the parties filed a Joint Status Report Relating to Mediation, whereby the parties disclosed details of a class-wide settlement of this action. The parties have agreed on a total settlement amount of $850,000, with $837,500 to be paid by Chanticleer’s insurance carrier and $12,500 to be paid by Creason & Associates, PLLC, subject to Court Approval. The Company has and will continue to vigorously defend itself in this matter.
 
Given that the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain, and the early stage of this class action, the Company can neither comment on the probability of potential liabilities, nor provide an estimate of such. As of December 31, 2013, no amounts have been accrued for related to this matter.
 
On March 26, 2013, our South African operations received Notice of Motion filed in the Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban, Republic of South Africa, filed against Rolalor (PTY) LTD (“Rolalor”) and Labyrinth Trading 18 (PTY) LTD (“Labyrinth”) by Jennifer Catherine Mary Shaw (“Shaw”). Rolalor and Labyrinth were the original entities formed to operate the Johannesburg and Durban locations, respectively. On September 9, 2011, the assets and the then-disclosed liabilities of these entities were transferred to Tundraspex (PTY) LTD (“Tundraspex”) and Dimaflo (PTY) LTD (“Dimaflo”), respectively. The current entities, Tundraspex and Dimaflo are not parties in the lawsuit. Shaw is requesting that the Respondents, Rolalor and Labyrinth, be wound up in satisfaction of an alleged debt owed in the total amount of R4,082,636 (approximately $480,000). The two Notices were defended and argued in the High Court of South Africa (Durban) on January 31, 2014. We still await Madam Justice Steyri’s judgement on the matter, no indication of timing of decision or further process has been given. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter.
 
Given that the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain and the early stage of this action, the Company can neither comment on the probability of potential liabilities, nor provide an estimate of such. As of December 31, 2013, no amounts have been accrued for related to this matter.
 
On April 1, 2013, the Company received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission, requesting various corporate documents relating to operations.  The Company intends to fully cooperate with the subpoena.
 
In connection  with  the acquisition  of the  business as described  in Note  3(whereby,  onOctober 1, 2011, Rolalor (Pty.) Ltd., Alimenta 177(Pty.) Ltd. and Labyrinth Trading (Pty.) Ltd. transferred their respective net assets to the newly formed entities controlled by the Company), the Company believes the purchase and sale with the seller was accomplished in accordance with  the laws and  regulations of  the  taxing  authorities   in  South  Africa. However, there can be no absolute assurance as to whether the business acquired continues to have any outstanding tax and regulatory filing requirements, as well as whether the local authorities could seek to recover any unpaid taxes or other amounts due from the Company, its shareholders or others.  The Company is not aware of any existing obligations that remain outstanding for which the Company may be required to settle. In connection with acquiring the net assets of the business, the Company may be entitled to be reimbursed by the seller for any pre-acquisition obligations of the business that may arise post-acquisition.
 
In addition, the Company has not filed certain corporate income tax returns for previous years, which could potentially result in penalties upon filing these returns.
 
In addition to the matters disclosed above, the company is involved in legal proceedings and claims which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. These actions, when ultimately concluded and settled, will not, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect upon the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the company.